News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


Fundies adrift over Pacific Gas & Electric's donation to No on 8

by: Pam Spaulding

Sat Sep 06, 2008 at 16:00:00 PM EDT


When San Francisco based Pacific Gas & Electric made a donation of $250K to fight the passage of Prop 8, it made the fundies hopping mad, because the usual tactic of screaming "boycott" presented some, er, difficulties for them. In the California Catholic Daily, take a look at the gyrations these folks are going through:
After San Francisco based Pacific Gas & Electric made the large donation to the No on 8 campaign, thousands of the company's frustrated customers expressed their outrage in the form of emails, letters and comments on various blogs. But a California public interest law firm that fights for conservative causes put its legal researchers to work and found another way for pro-marriage customers of PG&E to fight back: cancel natural gas service from the company.

"All residential and non-residential consumers can choose an alternative natural gas provider that does not agree with PG&E's controversial positions and actions," says the Pacific Justice Institute in a statement posted to its web site. "In addition, it was also uncovered that alternative providers, year over year, have reported saving their customers up to 15% off their natural gas bill compared to PG&E."

"There is no reason why pro-marriage homes, small businesses, corporations, apartment owners, schools or churches should continue to support a company like PG&E that is so opposed to the preservation of marriage," said Brad Dacus, president of Pacific Justice Institute.

The comments are hilarious. They will give it the old college try:
Posted Friday, September 05, 2008 9:16 AM By Linda
Great! Nothing hurts a company more than making a dent in its bottom line. PG&E (Promoting Godlessness & Evil) needs to stick to selling gas instead of promoting perversion that turns the sacrament of marriage between one man and one woman into the sacrilege of sodomite marriage.

Posted Friday, September 05, 2008 1:55 PM By Joe on central coast
PG&E There should be a law in California that would forbid a public utility to donate to a proposition on the ballot. Yes I do recommend that its customers change to an alternate supplier of natural gas. I did so a few months ago, not knowing I would be opposing PG&E. And by so doing, you will save money--not a lot but enough to make PG&E take notice.

Posted Friday, September 05, 2008 2:58 PM By John Feeney
Normally, brokers pay much less to the provider than a consumer. In that case, going through a broker would cost PG&E

Posted Friday, September 05, 2008 3:06 PM By Thomas
PG&E is the only provider in San Francisco, I guess the Bishop's will using candles at the evening mass! Vote NO on eight!!

Pam Spaulding :: Fundies adrift over Pacific Gas & Electric's donation to No on 8
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Why don't they give up gas & electric altogether?
And embrace the Amish lifestyle.

Are you ready?
A little Pacific Gas and Electric:





Claim to fame: Posted first PHB diary to be demoted


Private company not public utility
Ha! See, there is a "downside" to allowing our energy and water resources to be owned by private companies rather than the public.

I love this.

They want privitazation of everything and then complain when a particular private company doesn't act in their own interest.

Oh, the irony.

When you look for the bad in mankind, expecting to find it, you surely will.

- Abraham Lincoln.


Despite their donation, PG&E really, really sucks
The biggest culture shock to me when moving to the SF Bay area from Seattle was getting my mind around how just bad PG&E treats its customers.

I've got a bit of an insider's view on this.  When I moved here I transferred from the Viacom Cablevision Seattle office to the Viacom Marin county office.  My day to day job involved climbing power poles.  When I got here I was flabbergasted by the poor condition most of the PG&E plant (poles and related equipment) was in, and even more so by the frequency and sizes of power outages.  The vast majority of PG&E's poles would have been replaced long ago by Seattle City Light or the other major power company in Washington State, then known as Puget Power.  The same holds true for the actual wires, tranformers and switches.  Where the Washington power providers kept their equipment in good to excellent shape so that their customers could depend on a reliable source of electrical power, PG&E takes the opposite tack, replacing nothing until it actually fails and plunges its customers, including homes, businesses and hospitals into the dark.

Remember, "Erin Brockovich" is a true movie.  If you haven't seen it, or forgotten it, watch it.

Just remember that while PG&E is spending a few dollars on a donation to the No on 8 campaign, they are at the same time spending millions to bat back a ballot initiative that would mandate that the City of San Francisco dump PG&E and create a taxpayer based electric utility similar to Seattle's City Light.  It is an initiative that makes the ballot on a regular bases here, and one that, thanks to PG&E's millions of dollars spent refuting it each time, always loses.

Someday enough folks who have lived somewhere that offers a competent, well run utility will be in the majority here, and will send these greedy bastards packing.  In the meantime over at PG&E headquarters they are still cracking up about Grandma Tillie sitting in the dark.  


Try living in Monterey!
The power lines go down here whenever the wind blows.

I was without power for a week the last time. And, this happens three or four times a year here.

When you look for the bad in mankind, expecting to find it, you surely will.

- Abraham Lincoln.


[ Parent ]
SMUD, baby!
One of the reasons I don't want to move to Davis or West Sac is that I'd have to switch from SMUD to PG&E. It blew my mind when Yolo County voted to stick with PG&E becuse people fell for the lie that their bills would go up. I work in Davis, and I pay about half what my co-workers do in the summer months when you have to run a/c all the time.

So yeah, glad they made the donation and that it's pissed the fundies off--but I'm also glad I don't have to use their services.


[ Parent ]
I lived in SoCal when ENRON was flickin the switch on and off
I was so glad I lived in the LA city limits. Because LADWP never had to turn the power off once, unlike Santa Monica, Beverly Hills and West Hollywood. I am a firm believer public municipal utlities and rural electric Co-ops.

I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me. Hunter S.

[ Parent ]
I agree...
...with not letting utilities donate to ballot initiatives (we'd all be going bonkers if it went the other way).

I am also a firm believer in municipal and public ownership of water and energy (and hopefully internet) providers.


Here in California
Most of our water is owned by the British.

When you look for the bad in mankind, expecting to find it, you surely will.

- Abraham Lincoln.


[ Parent ]
At least they diverted some of the cash to a good cause this time.
When I lived in SF 20 years ago, PG and E was commonly understood to stand for "Pigs, Greed, and Extortion." I guess that hasn't changed.

That song is great! "Are You Ready" for a change?


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox