News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


Coulter: 'The word I used has nothing to do with sexual preference. It is a schoolyard taunt.'

by: Pam Spaulding

Tue Mar 06, 2007 at 09:00:00 AM EST


When someone hurls the new F-bomb at you, what do you think it's referring to? Ann doesn't think it has anything to do with sexual orientation. On Faux News last night (she appeared on there rather than debate John Aravosis on CNN), she also bleated that "It isn't offensive to gays. It has nothing to do with gays."

Faggot. (Kevin Aviance brutally gay-bashed in East Village)

Well, now I guess the conservative movement has to make a choice, and it'll probably be the wrong one -- it will continue to love Coulter because she represents The Base. This is who they are, despite the efforts of a few bloggers who were at that meeting and were offended enough to publish an open letter telling people to stop giving Coulter a public platform.

According to Think Progress, David Keene, president of the American Conservative Union (a co-sponsor of the CPAC), has he not said whether she'll be invited back again. Andrew Sullivan received this terse email from ACU:

ACU and CPAC leave it to our audience to determine whether comments are appropriate or not. "Ann Coulter is known for comments that can be both provocative and outrageous. That was certainly the case in her 2007 CPAC appearance and previous ones as well. But as a point of clarification, let me make it clear that ACU and CPAC do not condone or endorse the use of hate speech," said David A. Keene, ACU Chairman.
Faggot. (Gay Bashing Victim Dies After Family Removes Life Support)

At least some companies know what the word "faggot" means -- Verizon, Sallie Mae and Georgia-based NetBank have pulled ads from Coulter's web site. A NetBank rep said: Coulter's web page "is not the kind of site we want to be on." Verizon: "This one could be considered an extreme political Web site, should be off the list, and now it is off the list."

Again, this is less about Coulter than it is about the fact that she is a proponent of homophobia (and clearly schoolyard bullying) if she is going to spew it's a harmless word without a specific and well-known meaning.

People die, lose their jobs, are beaten and harassed because of homophobia. Is this what the GOP and the conservative movement stand for? That's fine with me, just don't try to pretend that's not what Coulter is saying.

Faggot. (72-year-old disabled gay man killed)

History has shown that the party of Bush has gone out of its way to be hostile toward gays and lesbians, its leaders pushing legislation to restrict and deny civil rights solely because of someone's orientation.

The GOP has been taken over by extremists and what we are looking at is a fight between the gay-baiting Base and the social moderates who have been silenced and out in the wilderness for years.

The party can choose its path, but the homophobes in the party aren't going down easily. Those in their movement need to step up and not just talk about Coulter, but about why too many conservatives and the GOP feel the need to rely on bashing LGBT citizens to make a point.

Faggot. (Hockey Coach Charged In Brutal Gay Bashing)

H/t, Joe.

Pam Spaulding :: Coulter: 'The word I used has nothing to do with sexual preference. It is a schoolyard taunt.'
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I have a question as to terminology, and this is as good a place to put the question as anywhere.
I distinguish between posts (those on the main page) and comments (those added by various commenters, which may or may not relate to the subject matter of the post on the main page).

What are "diaries"?  Are they what I'm referring to as "posts" (i.e. postings on the main page)?  From my childhood, a diary was a book in which someone recorded her or his musings over a period of time.  Das Tagebuch der Anne Frank.  Not an individual post on an individual subject on a particular day.

Thanks in advance for the information, and I'll conform to to the revised terminology, but, I'll just point out that there has to be a methodology by which posts (which are on the main page and presumably approved by the site's proprietors) and comments (which are not presumably approved by the sites proprietors) can be distinguished.


Terminology
Post:  as a Verb; To publish or add to, this includes comments, diaries, and front page posts.
as an Adjective; for the Blend a post is any story that makes it to the front page.

Diary: Adjective; Articles and stories created and published by the patrons of the Blend.  If they are promoted to the front page they become Posts.

Comments: This and other direct responses to diaries, posts, and other comments.

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." -- Thomas Jefferson


[ Parent ]
[Pedantry:On]
Actually, you mean "noun," not "adjective."

[Pedantry:Off]


[ Parent ]
LOL Yes
I did mean noun

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." -- Thomas Jefferson

[ Parent ]
Thanks...
...similar terminology is used at DailyKos, and I found "diary saving" confusing there.

[ Parent ]
Not a slur?
Okay, if Faggot has nothing to do with gays, and sexual orientation, and isn't a slur but just a schoolyard taunt (about what exactly?), then why did she say it and why did she reference Hardaway?  Of course, Fox News wouldn't push her to explain what she did mean and why she did say it.

She's like a little kid who will lie about anything and everything to get out of a tight corner.  And yes, I know she's contemptible and vile, but when I see her, I see a pathetic little loser who never grew up out of being unpopular and miserable and has turned her misery outward, spewing it onto the world.  She's made a small fortune thereby, sadly and bizarrely, and is a media darling nonetheless, but she stinks of desperation and fear--just watch her eyes some time.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


I see that same fear in her eyes, Lev.
Of course, faggot has everything to do with gays and her denying that punctuates her cowardice and disingenuity.

[ Parent ]
I HOPE that Ann Coulter has now
stained her reputation to be minimalized by the public as damaged goods. She's done this to herself, she deserves the fallout, perhaps she'll learn from it.

A lie
<<"It isn't offensive to gays. It has nothing to do with gays.">>

My experience forcefully contradicts both of those statements.

About the "rehab" reference she made in the original statement, was she not referring to Isaiah Washington who the used the word about T. R. Knight, a gay man?  (Washington later, reportedly, went into some type of "rehab.") The Washington-Knight matter was not otherwise a "schoolyard" situation, not even close.

I must conclude that she is lying.

It seems that she did something evil, and then is now using more evil to try to weasel out of it.

I hope GLAAD, HRC, bloggers, etc. go mega-blast on this, because this is extraordinarily outrageous.  The original comment was bad enough.  Then to say what she is now saying is...well, it's hard to find words for it.

Thank you, Pam, for your (as-always) fantastic service; your post was (as-typical) brilliant, particularly in how you clearly conveyed the connection between the word and its function.

I don't believe for one second that Ann Coulter is naïve about that word.  She is probably concerned now that would-be allies are shunning her, and most especially that advertisers are leaving her website, and her future income is jeopardy.  But she refuses to be candid, human, humble, self-reflective, thoughtful, empathic, fallible.

M. Scott Peck, the author of the famous The Road Less Travelled, wrote another book, less famous, called People of the Lie.  The subject was evil.  His definition of evil, as I recall, was basically the intentional, deliberate, knowing (vs. "knowing not what they do") prevention of the spiritual growth (or birthrights) of another person.  It's also known as sociopathy.

I try to use this word sparingly, but I'm afraid we have an evil person on our hands.


Where do we draw the line.....
Yes, Ann Coulter is hopefully going to reep what she sowed.

However, if we condemn her for using the f-bomb, why do we still tolerate Dire Straight's song, Money for Nothin' on the radio? I never liked that song as a kid in the 80's and I it still bothers me today because of the f word. Shall I complain to the station manager or is this song acceptible and allowed to continue to throw out the f-bomb on radio?


One of the conservative blogs...
...actually addressed that very question, and I agreed with his analysis. In "Money for Nothin'," the word is uttered by a pathetic, laughable character introduced in the song, not someone to be admired. It's meant to make you laugh at him. When Coulter said it, it was to get applause and laughter in agreement with her. In other words, we're in on the joke with one and not the other. This is also why the supposed homophobia in Kevin Smith movies has never bothered me.

Besides, most of the versions I hear on the radio nowadays have the word edited out.


[ Parent ]
Is that the same song with the line "I want my MTV" and something
about a "'f-' with an earring"?  I remember being appalled by just hearing that word, although I must admit I knew/know nothing else about the song.  I also noted Cher (mother of a gay child) on a commercial for MTV themed around the line "I want my MTV." 

[ Parent ]
Yes, same song...
I heard it on the radio just the other day unedited.

[ Parent ]
Yes...
That's the song. If I remember correctly, the song was based nearly verbatim on what the Dire Straights members had heard some worker at an electronics store or something saying while watching MTV. Basically, he was saying how easy it was to become a pop musician (the "faggot with an earring") and how musicians never have to work hard like they do.

But every time I heard it on the radio in South Jersey, when I used to live there, the word was edited out and replaced with "mother" or something like that.


[ Parent ]
MTV in early '80s was a NEW Concept
plus most Guys in Rock Bands had BIG HAIR DOs.
US Culture has progressed and moved on (thank goodness)

[ Parent ]
And this woman is supposed to be one of the intellectual leaders of the right?
Claiming that what she said was a "schoolyard taunt" doesn't make it any better in my eyes.  She's either a bigot or a bully (I'd posit both), and there's not much to choose between one and the other.

Pam, did you hear Rachel Maddow's comment last night on Countdown?  It was priceless!

"I'm of two minds about even talking about her, because I know that Ann Coulter needs publicity like a tapeworm needs a large intestine."


"If the apocalypse comes... beep me." -- Buffy Summers


I saw Rachel Maddow's comment last night
and though that may Ann Coulter flunked high school biology and lets what should be coming out of the large intestine come out of her mouth.

[ Parent ]
Inflamatory Language
There are a handful of words in the American/English language that everyone knows are off limits and could result in the speaker of those words being harmed for saying them. 

The C-word, the N-word, The F-word, the S-word, these
words are inappropriate in any context and at anytime.  It is amazing that a person of Ann Coulter's supposed intellect can say that she does not understand the norms of our society.

In reality, she uses this language to appeal to the groups that support her.  She purposfully selected the F-word, because other words insult more powerful subcultures.  She can attack gay and lesbians because she knows that this is not only acceptable in conservative political and religious culture it will rally those who financially support her.

Ann Coulter will never retract what she said.  She nkows full well it was wrong.  She will not retract if because it bought her another round of attention.

I believe that she has finally reached the point of making herself a pariah with moderate and rational conservatives.  Of couse Fox NEWS will continue to gush over her. 


of course Fox will keep her
But perhaps we've seen the last of her on shows like the Tonight Show. This should make the mainstream talk shows shun her. Though I haven't watched any TV lately - has any talk show given Washington or Hardaway a forum?

[ Parent ]
Oops
Sorry, I meant Washington not Hardaway, though rehab came up in some way with him, no? 

Let's parse Coulter's defense a little.  It wasn't a slur on gays, it didn't mean that she thought Edwards was gay, it was simply "a schoolyard taunt."

Now, here's an adult author, speaker, commentator who thinks it's perfectly apppropriate to use a schoolyard taunt in a speech to a roomful of politicos and political activists (or was it Q&A?).

In defending herself, she makes herself look worse.  The possibilities: she's either juvenile or mendacious.  Either one doesn't do her or the group she spoke to credit.

The fact that people in the Republic Party are condemning her means that we're seeing a slow change in the landscape--they're starting to recognize that hate speech and fear (because calling someone a faggot is not just demeaning but an attempt to strike fear into non-faggots) is not going to win them elections.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


she's either juvenile or mendacious
Try both not either/or

[ Parent ]
mendacity
Of course it's both, I just meant how she was presenting herself, not how I saw her.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

[ Parent ]
Yes, either juvenile or mendacious
I strongly suspect mendacious.

But juvenile reflects extremely poorly on her, and those who support/supported her, as well.

Note that whether mendacious (that being a near certainty) or juvenile, she maligns others as "godless."


[ Parent ]
Tactics
She is perfect exemplar of the Republic Party's tactics: when you say something offensive or do something abominably stupid, attack your critics.  Never apologize.  So for six years anyone who disagrees with the so-called war on terror is unpatriotic and Coulter attacks her critics in a similar slash-and-burn fashion.  I wonder what she uses to sedate all that fear, rage and shame you see in her eyes?  I don't believe that her pronouncements are merely an attempt to sell books, I think they are the cries of a soul in indescribable torment.  Why else would she need to call other people "godless"--she must feel that about herself.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

[ Parent ]
Lev,
have you read the book For Your Own Good by Alice Miller?  It contains perhaps the first plausible explanation for the behavior of Adolf Hitler beyond "he was crazy."  Miller makes a case that Hitler was also in indescribable torment, as a function of an unimaginably severe lack of love and a monstrous lack of empathy in his childhood.  To face and feel that pain directly is extremely difficult, and instead what happened/happens is that it gets externalized; that is to say, he acted out.  With extremely disastrous consequences (aided, of course, by other people's act-outs, too, which Miller also examines).

I have no doubt that Ann Coulter has severe emotional problems, per Lev.  Of course, that doesn't excuse her behavior, or mean that it should be tolerated or accepted, or mean that she shouldn't be fiercely boycotted and ostracized.  She deserves no less than a permanently ruined career.  This stuff is not acceptable, not matter what unavoidable tragedy may have been involved in its cause.  Just like Hitler's behavior was not to be tolerated even though he was at one time a victim himself.

Part of me wishes I could create a safe space for Ann Coulter, and look into those severely tortured eyes, and say, "What's going on for you?  Why are you so mean?"

Otherwise, I hold her completely accountable for her antisocial behavior, and hope for fitting, due consequences (as in a ruined career...and a little financial destitution might to be good, too, to help jostle her defenses).

And, by the way, her comments (and subsequent comments) were wwwaaaaaaayyyyyy worse than the "original" comments of Isaiah Washington and Tim Hardaway.  Way, way worse.  Washington's and Hardaway's comments were very awful, of course, but those folks were humble enough to very quickly express at least some remorse, as well as an openness to feedback, and to considering the effects of their actions.  Coulter has apparently deemed herself above that kind of decent, human, mortal stuff.  This hubris thing is not helping to redeem her (tortured) soul.


[ Parent ]
I haven't read it so I can't be sure
But I think the book in the Quality Paperback Book Club offering that came today might also be germane to better understanding - "The Sociopath Next Door"

[ Parent ]
Washington
Called one co worker a faggot while in the process of physically assaulting another. And Coulter's satiric point is that it's terrible for him to face consequences for that.

[ Parent ]
sad, but true
www.rememberingourdead.org

http://EQFL.org

Bomb-throwing
I forgot to say that Coulter not only atttacks, she always ups the stakes, as in this:

"Coulter said the comment was a joke and on her Web site she carried the speech with the comment, 'I'm so ashamed, I can't stop laughing.' She then said Edwards' campaign chairman's main job was 'fronting for Arab terrorists.'"

It's a brilliant job of misdirection, and manages to be even more outrageous, but it's not just a feint--it subtly links terrorism with gays.  Edwards is a "faggot," his chair is connected to Arab terrorists, gays and terrorists want to destroy our civilization.

Oh, where is Dr. Who when we need him?  Ann Coulter is a Dalek with a Battlestar Galactica remake.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


Thanks Pam
I can't think of another post I've seen that drives the point home so well.

If "faggot" "isn't offensive to gays," then why did this gay person's heart skip a beat when I opened up PDB and saw it in big red letters?  Why do I tense whenever I hear it bandied about as a derogatory slur (not in analytical discourse) on tv, in a movie, or from kids on the street? Personally, I have a built in "tense up" reaction when I hear the word.

How long do the "adults are in charge now" crowd get to keep putting bulls' eyes on the backs of LGBT people?  Adults indeed.

Electricity's for light bulbs!


ditto
Agree.  Thanks pam, right on the money so to speak with the post.  So many people do not get/think there's a connection between slurs and bashing...little question of that.

[ Parent ]
Ann Coulter is "Worthless".
Isn't Ann Coulter a little bit too old to be making schoolyard taunts?  Stupid hag.

gaining ground
I read that Verizon and Sallie Mae pulled their ads from Coulter's website. The GLBT community is gaining mainstream clout albeit at a snails pace.

 


Ann Coulter
we'll, she shouldn't of used the word "faggot", I think for John Edwards "wimp" would be a better fit.

Ann Coulter is quire brilliant, she has some great books:

Slander, Treason and Godless


Freudian shlip?
"Ann Coulter is quire brilliant"

If I remember "quire" is the Irish equivalent of "queer"

As for her books, they are intellectually week and it has been proven that large portions of the most recent one is largely plagiarized from a variety of sources and contains many error that even casual research would have uncovered (and did, unfortunately it wasn't Ann doing the research).


[ Parent ]
Riiiiight.
And Michael Richards doesn't see color.

What a cow.

(I use that in the schoolyard sense, of course; I'm not trying to suggest Coulter has the characteristics associated with cattle -- or, indeed, mammals -- such as a nurturing instinct or compassion for members of her own species.)

Blogwhoring @ http://indigestible.nightwares.com/


Phooey on Her
For a marvy pic of Uncle Sam spanking Ann Coulter, click below:

http://haplesstigger...

Thanks, Pam, for a post that drives the point home well.


sad.
www.rememberingourdead.org

http://EQFL.org

The point is not to make Coultergeist the issue...
...the point is to make the people who hire Coultergeist the issue.  They knew what they were getting when they hired Coultergeist, and they knew why they were hiring her--to induce people to pay to attend their convention.  And she--playing her Coultergeist character--delivered what she wanted.

The issue is to villify not only the people who hired her, but also the people who signed up to go to the convention.


The audience didn't know
exactly what she would say ahead of time, however -- and this is a very important "however" -- she has a long track record of atrocious homophobia.  The lack of concern about that -- as from Mitt Romney (who praised her before her talk), as from Chris Matthews (who let her "Al Gore is a big fag" comment pass), as from CPAC organizers, is a serious scandal.

An analogy may be drawn to how there is now a sudden burst of publicity about the terrible treatment of veterans across the entire VA medical system (not just Walter Reed).  But this is not some kind of new revelation or "new scandal."  It's been a scandal all along.  Likewise, Ann Coulter's homophobia has been a scandal all along.  Her being invited to CPAC is a scandal, regardless of the speech she ended up giving.  Mitt Romney's praise of her is a scandal -- a humongous one.  Verizon, etc. having ads on her website BEFORE "The Speech" is a scandal as well.

It's a sad and unfortunate thing that apparently we have to get to some kind of public-discussion tipping point before this stuff matters (e.g., Matthew Shepard wasn't the first person ever murdered for being LGBT).


[ Parent ]
No!...
...the audience might not have known in advance the specifics of what Coultergeist might say, but they know in advance what her bloviations would lead to.  So do the organizers of the CPAC conference.

The issue isn't so much that she rhetorically bashed faggots, and that she was paid for her effort.  The issue is that the organizers of the conference decided to hire someone who would be so stupid as to make silly comments like this.  The fact that the organizers of the conference would hire someone like Coultergeist, and, moreover, the fact that attendees would pay to attend says more about the attendees and the organizers than Coultergeist.

That last is the point.  Out the attendees.


[ Parent ]
Progress toward due ostracism
http://www.hrcaction...

And would Barnes & Noble or Borders carry books by David Duke?


Newspaper drops Coulter column
http://www.editorand...

First of many?


Reclaimed
Yes, her comment was not acceptable.

We must keep in mind that gay people hold some responsibility.  Why you ask?  Good question.  A group can not at the same time say a word is offensive and reclaimed at the same time.


That word-reclaiming thing
can be confusing, but I've not known anyone to "reclaim" the word "f-----."  And there is a movement (as in NYC) to encourage people to stop trying to "reclaim" the N word, which is probably a good idea.  Stopping the fundamental hate is a more profound, more lasting solution than reclaiming.

[ Parent ]
Wrong word.
The reclaimed word is "fag", not "faggot".

Blogwhoring @ http://indigestible.nightwares.com/

[ Parent ]
Surely you must jest.
Do you really think anti-homosexual people are going to take the time to look-up a "Reclaimed" list of words?  That is just silly.

[ Parent ]
No, I'm quite serious.
The reclaimed word is "fag", not "faggot".

It doesn't matter which term the homophobes use, of course; they're all off-limits for them.

Blogwhoring @ http://indigestible.nightwares.com/


[ Parent ]
You are missing my point.
If we say they are "Reclaimed" what right do we have in bitching when they use them?  We can not have it both ways, that is my point.


[ Parent ]
I think we're both right
and both wrong.

I've posted elsewhere about the use of the word "nigger", both in context of a classic film and a clearly hateful outburst.

You know, you're probably right that some can be confused by usage of some "reclaimed" words; but that just doesn't wash in some cases. For instance, if a person has a documented and lengthy history that is anti-gay, that person doesn't have the right to suggest that the word "faggot" is used innocently. Just as Strom Thrumond - may he rot forever - can't say that he used the word "nigger" in a schoolyard sense, ever, in his life.

The suggestion that Ann Coulter was "confused" by the "reclamation" of the word fag is stupid. She's a vicious woman and she knew exactly what she as doing when she spattered her bile on CPAC.

Blogwhoring @ http://indigestible.nightwares.com/


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox