News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


QNotes: What you didn't know about the Human Rights Campaign

by: Pam Spaulding

Tue Feb 24, 2009 at 06:00:00 AM EST


The Human Rights Campaign is the LGBT organization with the most name recognition, the most political contacts, and is usually called upon first when the MSM wants to get the "gay reaction." This is a sore spot for many average LGBTs out there; some have a love-hate (or even hate-hate) relationship with the org who feel that HRC is out of touch with their world view. But the fact of the matter is few average people really know much about how the organization works, its relationship to the community versus its public role, or its often-conflicting roles as both a lobbying group on the Hill and as a professional advocacy/activism org to the larger community.

That's why you have to click over to read QNotes editor Matt Comer's lengthy piece, "What you didn't know about the Human Rights Campaign: An inside look at the organization everyone knows, but not really." I spoke with Matt as he was working on the article (some of my comments made the cut), and I thought it was an ambitious project to write a primer on HRC. There's only so much space that can be devoted to it. Also, it's bound to ruffle feathers a bit, but largely it's written to give some context that will result in a more informed and less emotional discussion about what HRC can or should be for the LGBT community.

The Human Rights Campaign is known to almost every member of the LGBT community, even if only in the slightest of ways. It's branding and name recognition reach further than almost any other LGBT advocacy group. It's iconic blue and yellow equal sign logo has become one of the nation's most ubiquitous symbols of equality for LGBT people, seen everywhere from car bumpers, storefront windows, atop flagpoles in Manhattan or the front porches of the South, the tops of notebook computers and on high school and college students' three-ring binders.

But ask an average LGBT community member how HRC operates or who actually runs it and you're likely to get a blank stare and silence for a response. Ask someone if they know who Joe Solmonese is and some might might ask, "Who's that?" Board of Governors? Board of Directors? Steering Committee? What?

...Young queer folks first coming out of the closet quickly learn about HRC. Their presence is large enough to reach even the smallest hamlet, despite the lack of any sort of local gay advocacy there. There's no doubt HRC has earned its keep in national politics and a place in queer history.

Also interviewed for the piece is longtime activist, fellow Durham resident and former member of HRC's board of directors, Mandy Carter, who served in the wake of the tumultuous effort to unseat Jesse Helms back in 1990 (his opponent was the mayor of Charlotte at the time Harvey Gantt, who is black). Her comments and more are below the fold.
Pam Spaulding :: QNotes: What you didn't know about the Human Rights Campaign
Mandy Carter:
"I told them, 'There's not a penny I can give to you or raise,'" she says. "My being on the board was completely about my perspective as a black lesbian from the South."

Carter says she'll never regret the experiences and opportunities she was given while on HRC's board and later as a staff member. Nonetheless, Carter says she's often been frustrated by the organization's attempts to reach out to people of color.

"My main frustration was hearing a continual commitment to diversity but then not seeing it happen," she says. "That not just true for HRC, but also for lots of other groups. HRC certainly isn't the only one, but when you hear it and don't start to actually see it, that's a concern."

I share Mandy's concern that more cooperative projects with organizations like the National Black Justice Coalition would give the organization more credibility and perspective on mounting successful outreach in that respect. It could also play a more proactive and less competitive role with local LGBT organizations. For instance, HRC recently held its Carolinas dinner (Matt's piece was slated to publish in time for the event). This dinner raises thousands of dollars. How much of that goes into HRC's coffers versus local organizations that are often run on a relative shoestring? The advocacy in state legislature is vitally important in moving the ball forward locally, and since HRC only represents our interests on Capitol Hill, it's beneficial, when you're the big money machine and have the infrastructure, to find common ground and help grow those local orgs. Ryan Wilson, president of the South Carolina Pride Movement:
Wilson says HRC has nothing to lose and everything to gain from reinvesting the money they raise from local communities and from dinners like the HRC Carolinas Gala. "What would a few hundred or thousand dollars do if reinvested in the communities they take them from," he asked. "If you send staffers to the ground more often and do the trainings to build the volunteers, that will naturally build more money and membership."
I urge you to surf over to QNotes and read the whole piece. Matt covers a wide range of topics, including HRC history, the organization's structure and its program expenses. I look forward to reading your comments.
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Less "view from Olympus"
and more walking amongst us mere mortals would be a good place to start...

and maybe then they would hear our demands for equality, now, for all of us....

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid


There are differences
actually as I see HRC, there are two (or more) faces to the organization. There are the high on "Olympus" leaders, those who deal with elected officials and companies.

And than there are the community organizers who work in districts (I've meet a few of them, Lane Hudson was, until HRC had to let him go, the rep in western Michigan.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

(my links are acting weird today)
The way I see it having worked in the past. The community level people (although there are not enough of them) are the ones who work with us "common" folk. While the "leaders" of the group maintain their image of power so that they can try to work those people in D.C. and in corporate America.

While I don't agree 100% with everything HRC does (anyone who agrees 100% with any org, is well a sheep, see AFA), I agree with what Pam said later in the article. Often those who bash HRC the most, are those who if you ask them what they have done for LGBT rights, go blank. Try it the next time some one goes really anti-HRC, ask: "so what have you done?" If you get a real reply, it will usually be a personal attack against you.  

Help defend equality, visit One Kalamazoo http://www.onekalamazoo.com/


[ Parent ]
Oh and when
you ask someone what they have done, don't accept an answer like: "well I would have done it this way." Remind them that the question was, "what have you done?" Not what would you have done.

Its Monday morning quarterbacking at its worst. They're attacking the actions of a group after it acts. And they don't try to do something themselves (perhaps they're afraid someone posting on a blog will attack their actions :)

(P.S. I'm not including some of the distrust felt by many in the transgender community towards HRC. That's a whole other bag of well, issues.)  

Help defend equality, visit One Kalamazoo http://www.onekalamazoo.com/


[ Parent ]
Well, yes, Matt, there are those kinds of people
But there are also a good many seasoned activists who find HRC more frustrating and even counterproductive than helpful.  

Asking someone who raises a valid criticism of HRC "what have you done?" avoids the central question that ought to be under discussion:  What has HRC done?  Turning that question around to attack the questioner is less than productive.  (And as the old saying has it, you don't have to be a hen to judge an egg.)

I'd love to hear an objective accounting of what HRC has done (stripped of their nonsense about how they were responsible for the defeat of the FMA, for instance).  As Larry Kramer put it, I can't think of another organization that has lasted so long and raised so much money yet accomplished so little.

I am not interested in picking up crumbs of compassion thrown from the table of someone who considers himself my master. I want the full menu of rights.  -Archbishop Desmond Tutu


[ Parent ]
But what has HRC done?
No, seriously.  What have they done?  Point to one thing.  One piece of pro-LGBT legislation they got passed.  One piece of (viable) anti-LGBT legislation they stopped from getting passed (and don't say the federal marriage amendment, because that's NEVER really had a chance).

Want to know what I've done?  I've spent a week knocking on doors in Cincinnati to repeal Issue 3.  I wrote letters to New Mexico voters in 2004 to try to get rid of the Dubya.  In the most recent election, I phone banked in Queens to flip the NY State Senate so we can get marriage here.

But what has HRC done?  Seriously.  I'd like to know.


[ Parent ]
HRC in 2002-2003
I remember there being a large grassroots LGBT movement to urge our national orgs to make issue a statement opposing the invasion of Iraq by then president Bush.

It wasn't unheard of other civil rights groups in the US at that time to issue a statement saying that they opposed this invasion and after much pressure, many national and local LGBT groups did speak out.  The Task Force was one of many groups who finally "came out" and here in SF, the Board of the Pride Parade issued a resolution condemning war and the invasion of Iraq.

The only hold-out?  The "Human Rights" Campaign.

Why?  Because it wasn't a "gay issue".

I knew the Human Rights Champaign/Charade had made deals with the devil before, supporting Republican legislators who on one hand were mildly supportive of LGBT rights, but on the other supported legislation that negatively impacted various communities, including the LGBT community.

The HRC is and has always been narrow-minded and single-issue focused.  They are the typical example of a "gimme mine and screw the rest" organization that does nothing to build common bonds with likeminded civil rights and human rights groups.  This was apparent in their support of  trans-exclusive ENDA legislation.  But as I just pointed out with my example regarding the war in Iraq, this mindset goes back even further.

This is why, as a gay man who is active in politics and civil rights causes, I have not and do not support the HRC.


Yes, and...
That's part of the problem I've had with them.

If they weren't willing to come out against the war, how about at least using it as an opportunity to fairness by getting rid of DA/DT?

The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in time of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality. -- John F. Kennedy (inspired by Dante's Inferno)


[ Parent ]
A serious, non-emotional critique
I fully understand the context of Matt's piece and I do think that some of the general historical background is useful (irrespective of one's opinion of HRC, I think its critical to know who Steve Endean was - and where he was before the start of HRC.)  I also understand space limitations.

However...

I think its highly improper to not have any mention of what HRC is probably most infamous for: its (mis)treatment of trans people and issues.  This is not a demand for a pages-long tangent for (or against) trans-inclusion.  Rather, its simply my noticing that an organization that elsewhere in the piece is (rightly) called out for a lack of racial diversity escapes with not even a mention of its historical lack of trans-inclusion - particularly when (a) 'LGBT' is used throughout the article; and (b) the article includes this interesting quote from Mitchell Gold (from the second web page of the article):

"HRC does need to work effectively with North Carolina, as an example, to educate people and create a climate where the Kay Hagans of the world can get elected and reelected," he says. "One of the things about understanding national legislation is that if you look back in history, at various civil rights legislation, it wasn't passed nationally in one fell swoop."
Is it just me, or does that second sentence seem almost out of place - with its actual context being a chubk of standard operating apologia for ENDA trans-exclusion?

>^..^<

Not about ENDA
KatRose... Thank you for your comments about my story. I'm sure many don't here this from journalists but, thank you also for the criticisms.

Mitchell Gold's quote was a little awkward. Totally my fault. In a piece that large you know something is going to get messed up or a little screwy. I apologize to folks who might have been a bit confused about that paragraph.

However...

Gold was not speaking about ENDA. I just wanted folks to be assured of that.  

"Without progress the world stays static and when the world stays static, the wrongs of the past live on to the present." Notes on a culture in progress Nov. 14 2006


[ Parent ]
Thank you
And that should have been "I'm sure many don't hear this from journalists but, thank you also for the criticisms."

Sorry, Long day.

"Without progress the world stays static and when the world stays static, the wrongs of the past live on to the present." Notes on a culture in progress Nov. 14 2006


[ Parent ]
Finance Question
Reading the article, it looked like they raised $36M in 2006 and spent $25M on programs.

That's a terrible ratio - over 30% spent on administration and operating expenses.

Am I missing something?

The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in time of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality. -- John F. Kennedy (inspired by Dante's Inferno)


probably...
The overhead is probably much less than 30%.  Those programming expenses listed only included the 501(c)3/4, and didn't include money spent by the political action committee.

The article also said that their revenue exceeds their expenses by about $2M.  My guess is that they use that money for an endowment/rainy day fund.  


[ Parent ]
Thanks
Thanks Danelle. Your right: The figures only include monies from the 501(c)3 and 501(c)4. The article was huge already and I didn't have the space to delve into the PAC. Information on the PAC and its activities really could be an article in and of itself. In fact, many of the topics discussed in the article (and those not discussed) probably deserve whole articles on their own.

It was a challenging piece to write and it certainly isn't meant to be 100% detailed. But I hope that it gave some sort of basic, comprehensive look at HRC, what it is, how it functions and who runs it. You'd be surprised how many LGBT community members don't know many of the things discussed in the article. To be honest, I didn't know some of it myself.

"Without progress the world stays static and when the world stays static, the wrongs of the past live on to the present." Notes on a culture in progress Nov. 14 2006


[ Parent ]
Thank you for the hard work
I do want to point out that if they aren't meeting proper standards with reference to the percentage of money going for executive salaries, administration, and program, then that needs to be resolved before even getting to the issues you raise.

As for the criticism of the war, I think I mentioned, they didn't have to come out against the war, but they could have at least used the war as an opportunity to highlight DA/DT and work to get it fixed in fairness to gay and lesbian troops killed, wounded, and disabled in the war.

I do agree that the HRC has problems along the lines you mention and that is why my money goes elsewhere.

I don't know whether HRC needs to be fixed or whether we need to give more to organizations that are willing to take bigger risks than the HRC will take.

There's nothing wrong with having a more conservative civil rights organization as long as it isn't crowding out other organizations that take a more progressive and direct-action approach.

The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in time of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality. -- John F. Kennedy (inspired by Dante's Inferno)


[ Parent ]
Prostitutues
They in my mind are nothing more than take your money and screw ya over. They can spin the truth anyway they wish. I am done with them.  I joined HRC in 2000 or so an donated way to much to a cause, over $2,000usd ,they claimed that were all in it together. I don't trust them an no one else should either. They give great LIP service to minority, Transgender, and Bisexual causes. But they don't they just looking out for the White male strait acting males of the gay society.  IMHO >  

Pain is Inevitable .
Suffering is Optional  


I agree
My trans dollars are better sent to other organizations. With unemployment rates as high as 70% due to employment discrimination and an average annual income of $15,000, we simply can't afford to support any org. that isn't 100% behind trans rights. The need for employment protections and access to affordable and appropriate healthcare for trans people is dire. HRC will never get a dime from me until those issues are given the attention they so desperately need.

Tax the Christian Taliban!

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox