News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Calling Illinois: The Mormons Are At It Again

by: Chino Blanco

Wed Mar 04, 2009 at 00:38:13 AM EST


( - promoted by Pam Spaulding)

NOTE FROM PAM: The LDS continues to inject their anti-gay agenda to other states, and again show that the church confirms again that it not only wants to "protect marriage," but to keep gay and lesbian couples from obtaining any legal status for their relationships, in this case civil unions in Illinois (HB 2234) . I also received this email last night -  it was sent with the blessing of Bishop Chris Church of the Nauvoo, Illinois 3rd Ward.

The LDS needs to come clean about its prior statement that it has no problem with civil unions, never mind why it's inserting itself, yet again, in another state's politics regarding the issue of CUs. And why is an intervention like this being circulated in secret? If the church's position has changed on the matter, shouldn't they be willing to say so publicly and defend its actions, given the behavior of its leadership and flock during the Prop 8 fracas? I'm sick of the pious acting like a bunch of mafia gangsters.


------ Forwarded Message
From: (redacted)
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009
To: (redacted)
Subject: Nauvoo Ward Spreading Lies/Fear to Oppose Civil Unions

The following official email was just sent out (via the LDS Church website) to all the members of the Nauvoo 3rd Ward, as approved by  
Kristy Combs, ward website administrator, and by Bishop Chris Church of the Nauvoo 3rd Ward.  (Because it was sent through the LDS  
website, it required the authorization of a bishop or higher.)

I am stunned and angered by the misinformation being spread in such an official church communication through the LDS Church website.  
Once again, "our children" are the reason for spreading hatred, hysteria, and lies.

And did they not get the memo that the LDS Church is not opposed to civil unions?

PLEASE DISTRIBUTE WIDELY.  And if you live in Illinois, contact your legislators to support this bill!

Chino Blanco :: Calling Illinois: The Mormons Are At It Again
From: Kristy Combs <kristyc@mchsi.com>
Date: March 3, 2009
Subject: Civil Union bill scheduled for a hearing Thursday - calls needed

This message has been authorized for sending by Bishop Church.

The Civil Union Bill (HB 2234) has been scheduled for a hearing in the Youth and Family Committee this week on Thursday, March 5, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. in Springfield.  If the bill is voted out of committee, it becomes eligible for a vote before the full Illinois House of Representatives.

This bill will legalize civil unions in the state of Illinois, and will treat such civil unions with the same legal obligations, responsibilities, protections and benefits as are afforded within marriage.  In other words, civil unions will be different in name only from marriage.  As has already been seen in Massachusetts, this will empower the public schools to begin teaching this lifestyle to our young children regardless of parental requests otherwise.  It will also create grounds for rewriting all social mores; the current push in Massachusetts is to recognize and legalize all transgender rights (An individual in Massachusetts can now change their drivers license to the gender they believe themselves to be, regardless of actual gender, which means that confused men and women are now legally entering one another's bathrooms and locker rooms.  What kind of a safety issue is this for our children?).  Furthermore, while the bill legalizes civil unions, it will be used in the courts to show discrimination and will ultimately lead to court mandated same-sex marriages.

To help defeat this bill, please call your state representative and state senator and ask that they support traditional marriage and vote  
against the civil unions bill.  If you are unsure who your legislators are, please see the link at the end of this email.

Also, please take a moment and call the following members of the Youth and Family Committee to encourage them to vote no on this bill.  We need 4 votes to keep it from passing out of the committee.  And - as always, please pass this on to all who believe in protecting our families and our children.  If you are interested in attending the hearing, it will be held on Thursday, March 5th at 9:00 a.m. in Springfield in Room 122B of the Capitol Building (I can give you directions to the Capitol Building if needed).

Members of the Youth and Family Committee:

Rep. Greg Harris (D-Chicago)  
(Greg Harris is also the sponsor of this bill, but he needs to hear your opposition to this bill)
Chairperson
217-782-3835

Rep. LaShawn K. Ford (D-Chicago)
Vice-Chairperson
217-782-5962

Rep. Mike Fortner (R-West Chicago)
Republican Spokesperson
217-782-1653

Rep. William D. Burns (D-Chicago)
217-782-2023

Rep. Michael P. McAuliffe (R-Chicago)
217-782-8182

Rep. Al Riley (D-Matteson)
217-558-1007

Rep. Dave Winters (R-Rockford)
217-782-0455

Directions for identifying your legislators:

You can use the following link to identify your state legislators and their contact information:  http://www.elections.il.gov/DistrictLocator/SelectSearchType.aspx?NavLink=1 (and enter your 9 digit zip code).  If this link doesn't work, you can use the general link www.ilga.gov and then click on "legislator lookup" near the bottom of the page, then click on "by zip+4".  Type in your zip code, and you'll see a list of your legislators.  You want your state senator and state representative as they will be the ones voting on the bill.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Sister Combs

Updates:  

I just noticed that Jim Burroway over at Box Turtle Bulletin posted this earlier as EXCLUSIVE: Mormon Machine Cranking Up Against Illinois Civil Unions Bill.

And now I see that Rainey has a diary over at Daily Kos as well: LDS now wants to shut down civil unions in IL.

Good.  Time is short and I hope this lights up the blogosphere before March 5th.

Between now and then, can someone - anyone - from LDS Church HQ please clarify your organization's position on civil unions?

Is it the position that Utah Gov. Huntsman recently staked out (he's for 'em)?  Or is it that of Bishop Church and the Nauvoo 3rd Ward (they're against 'em)?  

Somewhere in the middle?

Yes? No? Maybe so?

Memo to Salt Lake:  How are the rest of us supposed to have a civil dialogue with a church that refuses to make its own position known?  Enough with the guessing games already.  You've got your own members running around telling everyone who will listen that their church is not anti-gay, that Mormons view civil unions as unobjectionable enough to leave well enough alone, and then you pull a stunt like this.

I'm not the only one tired of this under-the-radar Mormon politics-by-email.  Plenty of faithful Mormons have had enough as well:

So here I get another alarming mail from a good Church member ... The aim of these mails is to foster anger against those that seem to threaten our ideals. It is part of a rhetoric based on lies, or at least on severe alterations of the truth. It triggers people to promptly rally to causes without knowing all the facts.

Memo to Mormons:  If you're going to stand up for your ideals, you need to first know what those ideals are.  If you're at all unclear about that, simply working to make sure the other side loses every time becomes nothing more than a stalling tactic.  At some point, you're going to have to figure out what you stand for and start speaking out about that instead of merely reacting and characterizing those of us with a modicum of clarity about our political ideals as "angry" and "mean" ...

Gratuitous further update:  EXCLUSIVE: Sen. Hatch's secret drug firm links

Orrin, that one's for picking Jeff Flint to run your disastrous 2000 presidential campaign.  That said, Jeff finally made good, didn't he?  Anywho, I'll pass along my congrats to Jeff through Frank when I see him up at the Manning Networking Conference & Exhibition 2009.  I'm just worried about putting Jaime on the spot when I do.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Minor quibble ...
And a request: if I'm right, pls delete this comment once it's read:

The acronym "LDS" stands for "Latter-day Saints"

So, I'm thinking it should be treated as plural, i.e.:

"The LDS continue ..." (no s)

Or, otherwise, "The LDS church continues ..." would be fine.

Or, I could be wrong.  In which case, pls post this comment and correct me!

Cheers.

twitter.com/ChinoBlanco | youtube.com/ChinoBlanco


Singular
You are right that S is for Saints, but LDS is a singular group so "LDS continues" is right.

[ Parent ]
I don't expect to win this one ...
... and that's OK.

Bigger fish to fry and all.

twitter.com/ChinoBlanco | youtube.com/ChinoBlanco


[ Parent ]
Oh my, re-reading that, I sound downright pissy.
Mea culpa.  Carry on.  I need to learn to stop posting gratuitous and/or grating comments under my own diaries.


twitter.com/ChinoBlanco | youtube.com/ChinoBlanco

[ Parent ]
Subject-Verb Agreement
It doesn't matter whether or not the abbreviated term appears to be plural or singular -- it is still a singular group.

Let's say you have a group called Southern California Bears or SCB.

The following would be correct:

- Southern California Bears is a great organization.

- SCB is a great organization.

General Motors (GM) is the example used in a few style guides.

Wrong: General Motors continue to lose money.

Right: General Motors continues to lose money.

General Motors is not plural. Latter-Day Saints isn't plural either.

- Latter-Day Saints continues to be an anti-gay church.

- LDS continues to be an anti-gay church.

However, acronyms and abbrevations can be plural.

If the abbreviation is plural, then you use the verb that agrees with it.

- An MBA is the best degree to have in business.

- MBAs are the best degrees to have in business.



When you look for the bad in mankind, expecting to find it, you surely will.

- Abraham Lincoln.


[ Parent ]
Uncle, uncle ...
I stand corrected.  

That said, the Southern California Bears still suck.

;-)

Apropos of nothing in particular, I happen to have this in my clipboard for everyone's edification:

If I could make one suggestion ...

Please don't protest at Mormon Temples. You won't find more than a handful of Mormons there at any given time, and 90% of them will be over 65 - not exactly a key demo.

If you're in Illinois (or elsewhere), pls take advantage of:

http://maps.lds.org/

That URL will help direct you to the nearest Mormon chapel (not temple) in your area. Grab a few friends and go protest in front of a Mormon chapel some Sunday morning.

Granted, that doesn't help much with the current Illinois situation, with its March 5th deadline looming, but going forward, c'mon, get a clue, Mormons attend a 3-hour block of services every Sunday at their chapels ... show up, interact, and make an impression.

Hanging outside Mormon temples taunting security guards is not the best way forward.

That said, this is not me dissin' previous Mormon temple protests. It's all good and that had to happen. My only point is that it's now time to think about taking it local and personal by showing up at a building that actually has sentient beings inside.



twitter.com/ChinoBlanco | youtube.com/ChinoBlanco

[ Parent ]
It is National Grammar Day, BTW.
http://nationalgrammarday.com/

When you look for the bad in mankind, expecting to find it, you surely will.

- Abraham Lincoln.


[ Parent ]
How long until the lose their tax exempt status
for all this politicing?

ACTION ALERT
I put up an ACTION ALERT on LGBT Rainbow Links with a link to this posting.

Lyndon Evans
Publisher

Just because your voice reaches halfway around the world doesn't mean you are wiser than when it reached only to the end of the bar. - Edward R Murrow




Seeing as how Pam commented on this post ...
I just wanted to second what Pam's getting at here:

It's one thing when I head over to Maine and recognize Miriam Conners as a Mormon mom who's involved with an outfit that opposes marriage equality in that state.

At least Miriam's willing to put her name out there and take a position via an unabashedly (if whiny) political org.

It's something else entirely to be constantly bombarded with in-group-only messages from church "leaders" who seem to be doing everything in their power to avoid the kind of "civil debate"/"civic debate" that they inevitably only call for after the ballots have been counted.

If you're Mormon, and you're reading this, how much more can you put up with before you call out this nonsense for what it is?  C'mon.  It's corrosive.  It's anathema to every American ideal my Mormon parents instilled in me.  Is it simply that my folks didn't raise us in Utah - land of the brave, home of the passive-aggressive?

OK, deep breaths, I'm ranting.  Look, I've enjoyed every visit I've ever made to Utah.  My two years at BYU were tops.  Great profs, good people.  Pity it's gonna be a while before I can allow myself to visit again ... and all because, dammit, at what point do you Mormons who should know better begin to rise up with one voice and condemn what now looks set to be another 50 rounds (50 states) of well-financed Calvinball?  Do it - rise up - and I'll see y'all at the next Sunstone symposium and we'll talk.  Or not.  Personally, I don't expect you to come through.  Have you ever?  Not that I can tell.  Nope, as far as I can tell, this is their church, and you're just stuck trying to figure out how to preserve some shred of your human dignity inside their church by surreptitiously nodding meaningfully in the direction of your non-Mormon peers who you respect/resent for being able to live lives free to call an injustice for what it is.  

Bill Marriott and Mitt Romney can make their millions through their porn distribution channel aka hotel chain.  I don't care.  My kids will never catch us watching the stuff, because we don't (watch), and we're raising them with the understanding that what's on offer at Marriott is a poor, degraded version of what's available in a real-life relationship, even if (and especially because) the latter happens to be harder work.  People will make their own choices.  Whatever.  Those are not our choices.  (That said, as I'm not a Utahn, the probability that I might be a porn addict is already seriously diminished, so I probably shouldn't get too self-righteous here.)

In any case, this is not about porn.  It's not about allowing clients to make a choice.  It's about something that led Bill Marriott to rightly put as much distance between his company and the Prop 8 aftermath as he possibly could:  it's about being comfortable (or not, in my case) with the idea of adding a feather to one's cap at the expense of denying one's fellows the same rights you already enjoy.  

When I check in at a Marriott, nobody dares ask me if I was born to add the $12.99 in room charges that my potential choices might incur.  So, why is it, when we're talking about "choices" that are even less anyone else's business, does it all-of-a-sudden require the input of Mormons as to how they feel about such "choices"?

It doesn't.  But here we are.  Mormons are calling their state reps and senators in Illinois as I type.  

To all my Mormon friends:  if you want to justify that, go right ahead.  But do it out in the open.  If it's a moral victory you're after, you should be shouting it from the rooftops; not hiding your candle under a bushel of private emails.

twitter.com/ChinoBlanco | youtube.com/ChinoBlanco


The magic undies people want to come in
Illinois? Shit, I couldn't even tell you where the m*****f*****g Mormom temple is...

Well, now I can. 4151 N. Lake Ave in Glenview, I used to work not to far from there, I know EXACTLY where that is.


Damn!
Join the Impact/ Chicago is having a candlelight vigil down at the f**k**g Water Tower tonight. And I have work to do today. And I have a meeting tonight with my advocacy group. I need to make a phone call or too.


Time to start recirculating
that memo about only wanting to protect the word.

I am the lizard queen!

The address of the Mormon
Temple that I posted is not the Nauvoo Church, that's in the eastern part of the state near the Illinois-Iowa border on the Mississippi River.  

Well...I have all the info
that I need now as far as getting some protests organized.



I'm fairly certain my state rep is on board
But I emailed him (John Fritchey) anyway to make sure he's a supporter of the HB.  I haven't heard back yet.  It can take a few days, as he actually reads/responds himself.

Yeah, Julie Hamos should be on board
but I will fire off one just in case.

Isn't Illinois the state that had this wonderful order against this church?


Yeah
in fact, I am learning a lot of things about the Mormon Church in Illinois, Joseph Smith was killed here, for example. I want to go read about this and about the Mormons generally now.

[ Parent ]
Yes, the order was
adopted in 1846 and rescinded on April 1, 2004.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I...


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox