PHB Mobile

News Tips? Calendar Info?


Public Calendar

Press/media, organizations, and individuals send your time-based event info to: calendar@phblend.net

Full size PHB Calendar


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas









The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Chris Dodd

Senator Chris Dodd: I now support marriage equality

by: Pam Spaulding

Mon Jun 22, 2009 at 11:44:56 AM EDT

I was just contacted by Adam Wells of Sen. Chris Dodd's (D-CT) office who wanted to let Blenders know that the Senator has changed his mind about marriage equality and sent on an op-ed written for the The Meriden Record-Journal  explaining his evolution on the matter.  It's odd, isn't it, that our President has moved in the opposite direction since his days running for the U.S. Senate. The constitutional law prof supported marriage equality then, but now "God is in the mix."

Sen. Dodd and Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA, who voted for DOMA) have moved in the direction of equality. Why can't our "fierce advocate"?

Rights, Responsibilities and Love

June 21, 2009

Public officials aren't supposed to change their minds. But I firmly believe that it's important to keep learning. Last week, while I was in Connecticut meeting with members of the gay and lesbian community from across the state, I had the opportunity to tell them what I've learned about marriage, and about equality.

While I've long been for extending every benefit of marriage to same-sex couples, I have in the past drawn a distinction between a marriage-like status ("civil unions") and full marriage rights.

The reason was simple: I was raised to believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. And as many other Americans have realized as they've struggled to reconcile the principle of fairness with the lessons they learned early in life, that's not an easy thing to overcome.

But the fact that I was raised a certain way just isn't a good enough reason to stand in the way of fairness anymore.

The Connecticut Supreme Court, of course, has ruled that such a distinction holds no merit under the law. And the Court is right.

I believe that effective leaders must be able and willing to grow and change over their service. I certainly have during mine - and so has the world. Thirty-five years ago, who could have imagined that we'd have an African-American President of the United States?

My young daughters are growing up in a different reality than I did. Our family knows many same-sex couples - our neighbors in Connecticut, members of my staff, parents of their schoolmates. Some are now married because the Connecticut Supreme Court and our state legislature have made same-sex marriage legal in our state.

But to my daughters, these couples are married simply because they love each other and want to build a life together. That's what we've taught them. The things that make those families different from their own pale in comparison to the commitments that bind those couples together.

And, really, that's what marriage should be. It's about rights and responsibilities and, most of all, love.

I believe that, when my daughters grow up, barriers to marriage equality for same-sex couples will seem as archaic, and as unfair, as the laws we once had against inter-racial marriage.

And I want them to know that, even if he was a little late, their dad came down on the right side of history.

I have always been proud of my long record fighting for the civil rights of the LGBT community. I've co-sponsored legislation to strengthen hate crime laws and end discrimination in the workplace. I've spoken out against "don't ask, don't tell" and always supported equal rights for domestic partnerships.

But I am also proud to now count myself among the many elected officials, advocates, and ordinary citizens who support full marriage equality for same-sex couples.

I understand that even those who oppose discrimination might continue to find it hard to re-think the definition of marriage they grew up with. I know it was for me.

But many of the things we must do to make our union more perfect - whether it's fighting for decades to reform our health care system or struggling with a difficult moral question - are hard. They take time. And they require that, when you come to realize that something is right, you be unafraid to stand up and say it.

That's the only way our history will progress along that long arc towards justice.

UPDATE: HRC's Michael Cole passed on a link to an entry on Back Story by Brian Rice of HRC's Board of Governors. Rice met with Dodd and and other CT activists. Dodd has a 100% HRC Scorecard rating. A snippet.
Senator Dodd also let us know that he was committed to ensuring that federal rights were portable, so that a same-sex couple married in Connecticut would receive the federal benefits of marriage even if they relocated to a state without marriage equality.  He also said that he was committed to finding a vehicle in the Senate to advance hate crimes legislation and hoped that the bill would be passed soon.  Finally, he agreed to look into adding sexual orientation and gender identity to a bill called the Affordable Health Choices Act, a move that would provide for research regarding the health concerns of the LGBT community.
Discuss :: (82 Comments)

Dodd answers questions from HRC/LOGO forum

by: Pam Spaulding

Tue Aug 14, 2007 at 19:30:00 PM EDT

Dem presidential candidate Senator Chris Dodd was unable to make last week's VisibleVote 08 forum, but he did take the time to answer all the questions posed by the forum's panel.

Read them below the fold.
There's More... :: (1 Comments, 1553 words in story)

Dodd drops out of HRC/LOGO debate

by: Pam Spaulding

Sat Aug 04, 2007 at 00:00:00 AM EDT

Chris Dodd's camp announced that he will not appear at HRC/LOGO's "The VisibleVote 08: A Presidential Forum" slated for next Thursday, August 9th at 9 PM ET/6pm PT in Los Angeles.
Dodd informed LOGO television which will broadcast Thursday's debate, and the Human Rights Campaign which helped arrange it, that "scheduling conflicts" made it impossible for him to attend.

Dodd and Joe Biden will be the only Democratic candidates not to participate in the groundbreaking debate.

...Asking questions of the candidates will be a panel comprised of journalists Jonathan Capehart and Margaret Carlson, musician/activist Melissa Etheridge and HRC president Joe Solomonese.

The panelists in a statement said they plan to cover a range of issues including relationship recognition, marriage equality, workplace fairness, the military, hate crimes, HIV/AIDS and other important issues.

Discuss :: (8 Comments)

Chris Dodd torches O'Reilly over insane attacks on YK

by: Pam Spaulding

Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 07:00:00 AM EDT

Heh. Connecticut Senator and presidential candidate Chris Dodd went toe-to-toe with the Faux News bully about O'Reilly's insane obsession O'Reilly with the progressive blogging community in general and smearing Daily Kos/Yearly Kos in particular, screeching about all the "vile postings" on the site.

Dodd called out O'Reilly for one of the outrageous statement bleated on Billo's radio show. O'Reilly then tries to lie his way out it by parsing that he didn't say it on "this program" (meaning the TV show). Too bad for him that Media Matters keeps track of the crap that comes out of O'Reilly's piehole.

"[I]f Al Qaeda comes in here and blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it. We're going to say, look, every other place in America is off-limits to you, except San Francisco."
Discuss :: (10 Comments)

Chris Dodd: 'What would you do if your child were gay?'

by: Pam Spaulding

Fri Apr 06, 2007 at 11:30:00 AM EDT

Dem presidential candidate Sen. Chris Dodd (CT) is asking the right question. Make people think and talk about the issue of marriage equality, don't bury it or run from it. He asked this at a Concord High School in New Hampshire.
Dodd said anyone who would deny a gay child the right to be happy isn't being honest.

"We ought to be able to have these loving relationships," the Connecticut senator said.

Dodd, the father of a 2- and a 5-year-old, said his daughters could grow up to be lesbians and he hopes they would have the opportunity to enjoy marriage-like rights.

"They may grow up as a different sexual orientation than their parents," Dodd said. "How would I want my child to be treated if they were of a different sexual orientation?"

Dodd, who opposed a constitutional amendment to limit marriage to man-woman unions, said he supports civil unions, but not gay marriage. Asked afterward what he sees as the difference, he said: "I don't think probably much in people's minds. If you're allowing that, all the protections you have there, you've covered it."

Dodd, you might recall, was open about the need to repeal or amend the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act, which prevents of civil unions or same-sex marriages from being recognized outside of those states that legally acknowledge them -- and no federal benefits convey as long as it is in place. He was asked about it by Joe Sudbay of Americablog (via PoliticsTV) at the winter DNC meeting in February.

"I think it ought to happen. To me the country is way ahead of us on these issues. I think the American people are there."

Where are the rest of the candidates on DOMA? MIA. See my last update on that.

H/t, Herb.

Discuss :: (4 Comments)
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox