The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend: "a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).
"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist." (Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger." (MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
The appalling story coming out of Raleigh, North Carolina today of two men charged with crimes against nature long after Lawrence v. Texas made such a prosecution illegal reminded me that Lawrence is a link in a much longer story. It’s mentioned in some of the coverage that all "crimes against nature" laws were determined unconstitutional by Lawrence and that the previous NC law was limited to a three year sentence and note is made of a scathing opinion by Judge Braxton Craven. But – the news article ( http://tinyurl.com/49ak49 )and legal history ( http://tinyurl.com/3nc3d2 )excise some very key facts.
So – let us go back to a time before Stonewall, before Compton’s, before Dewey's. To a place much less liberal than Massachusetts, New York or Maryland. Let's look at North Carolina; all the way back a quarter of a century before Barney Frank came out, before John Aravosis was even born. At that time” same sex relations” were not only crimes, they were felonies. A crime that was punishable by up to 60 years in prison in North Carolina. But something happened that was about to change that.
Maxine Doyle Perkins was sentenced to between twenty and thirty years in prison.
When the United States Supreme Court invalidated all state sodomy laws in the landmark 2003 Lawrence v. Texas ruling it didn't take those state laws off the books. Last night in my state, two men, in what appears to be a domestic dispute/sexual assault case that occurred in private, were charged by the police under the North Carolina's ridiculous "crimes against nature" law (CAN). From the Raleigh N&O:
Raleigh police first charged Nelson Keith Sloan, 40, of Grand Manor Court, who called them to his apartment about dawn, saying he had been attacked.
Police later filed the same charge against Ryan Christopher Flynn, 25, of Glen Currin Drive. They also charged Flynn with simple assault for biting Sloan. And they charged him with communicating threats by telling Sloan he was going to disembowel him and show him his innards.
"This looks like a case of a consensual act that may have gotten out of hand," said Raleigh police Capt. T.D. Hardy. "The law is still on the books. Our detectives got involved in it last night and decided this was the best thing to do. What the D.A.'s office will do with it, I don't know."
Sloan, however, said he was the victim of an assault. "I didn't allow anything," he said Saturday after being reached at home by phone. "They knew it and turned it around and arrested me. I have never been so humiliated in all my life. It's just awful."
And, in the ultimate outrage - the police did not charge Flynn with sexual assault. As you read, the police captain 1) doesn't believe a sexual crime occurred; and 2) doesn't have a problem with arresting the men under this law, when everyone knows a heterosexual couple would never be charged with CAN.
(Note: The following is a cross-post from Q-Bomb. I know that there are things that are far more important for Missouri LGBT groups to spend resources on, but I just want others to be conscious of this happening.)
I found this on CNN about Michael Devlin, that guy who kidnapped those two kids in Missouri:
A 41-year-old Missouri man accused of kidnapping two boys was charged Monday with multiple counts of forcible sodomy.
St. Louis County prosecutor Robert McCulloch has filed 71 charges against pizzeria manager Michael Devlin.
The first 18 counts -- one count of kidnapping and 17 of forcible sodomy -- relate to last month's abduction of a 13-year-old boy; the remainder are kidnapping and forcible sodomy charges related to the 2002 abduction of a now-15-year-old boy.
